Shouldn't Visit Qingxiu Mountain Scenic Area in Nanning, Guangxi

On April 1, 2025, around 10 AM, we heard that Qingxiu Mountain in Nanning, Guangxi, was uniquely special. We took our childrens and a small toddler bike, which has been certified as harmless in countless situations. The bike is so tiny that even a medium-sized pet could compete with it in size. We were excited to visit the "nationally renowned" Qingxiu Mountain, a 5A-level tourist attraction, to relive old memories and let our child experience the "international-level" charm of this green lung of the south.

Little did we know that this trip would turn into a farce worthy of being recorded in personal travel history and even analyzed in future management case studies. The main character of this farce was the ticket inspector at the entrance, whom we respectfully call "Mr. Excellent Qingxiu Mountain International Ticket Checker."

N Decibels of Authority and the "No Toddler Bikes Allowed" Decree

The ticket purchasing process was smooth, thanks to modern technology. However, the real drama unfolded at the ticket inspection point. As we pushed the tiny toddler bike towards the entrance, Mr. Excellent made his appearance.

Allow me to use some rhetoric to describe the scene. Mr. Excellent did not use the usual polite or even neutral communication style expected in the service industry. Instead, he unleashed a voice that, by our conservative estimate, reached at least "N decibels." This voice was not just loud; it carried an unquestionable, commanding authority. The core message was clear: "This little bike is not allowed inside!"

We, as ordinary tourists who respected the scenic spot and had paid the entrance fee, were stunned. It was like listening to heavy metal rock in the middle of a classical music concert. Confusion was the most direct and appropriate emotion at that moment. Why were we confused?

Challenging Experiential Rules

This tiny bike, which we considered insignificant, had accompanied us and our young child to numerous scenic spots in Nanning and other parts of Guangxi. These included free and paid attractions, star-rated places, and simple community parks. Even some "international-level" scenic spots allowed it. The bike was always treated as a necessary aid for toddlers, just like a stroller, and faced no objections.

Direct Denial of Experience

More puzzling was that this was not our first visit to Qingxiu Mountain. We vividly remembered our last visit when this same bike left its tiny tracks on the shady paths. Based on the principle of "once allowed, always allowed" and the reasonable expectation of "past permission," we had every reason to believe that bringing the bike inside this time was reasonable and lawful.

The Reverse Embodiment of "5A-Level" Standards

A 5A-level tourist attraction usually implies higher management standards, better facilities, and more humane visitor experiences. We naively believed that such a high-level scenic spot would be more inclusive and convenient, especially for families with young children. Prohibiting a bike clearly meant to assist young children seemed to contradict the "visitor-first" philosophy of a 5A-level attraction.

Raising Objections and Reaffirming Authority

Based on the above reasons, we tried to express our confusion and objections to Mr. Excellent. His response was to raise his "N decibel" authoritative voice even louder, accompanied by a disdainful and dismissive attitude. He did not provide any substantive explanation, such as citing a specific rule or explaining the policy change. He simply repeated, "This bike is not allowed, period!"

Faced with such an authoritative and dismissive stance, we ordinary tourists had no choice but to comply. We left the little bike in the parking lot outside the scenic area.

The "United Nations of Bikes" Inside the Park

Upon entering Qingxiu Mountain, we were astonished to see various bikes of different sizes and types freely roaming the park. There were professional racing bikes, large children's bikes, and standard adult bikes, all coexisting harmoniously in this "sacred" land where our tiny toddler bike was forbidden.

We pointed out these bikes to Mr. Excellent and asked why they were allowed while ours was not. His response was again dismissive, reiterating that our bike was not allowed, and we could file a complaint if we wanted. The phone number he provided was unreachable, adding to the absurdity of the situation.

The Absence of Courtesy and a Note on "Civilized City"

Throughout the interaction, Mr. Excellent did not use a single polite phrase. Instead, he displayed disdain and arrogance, as if our presence and the little bike were disturbances to his "sacred" work.

This made us think about Nanning's title as a "National Civilized City." Beyond clean streets and good facilities, a civilized city should embody mutual respect and professionalism in service. Our experience at the entrance of this 5A-level scenic spot was far from civilized.

Puzzling Logic and Speculative Explanations

Given the situation, we tried to understand the possible "deep logic" behind it. Here are a few speculative explanations:

Explanation A: Size Discrimination Perhaps there is an internal rule prohibiting bikes below a certain size. Larger bikes are allowed because they meet the "safety standards," while our tiny bike poses an unpredictable risk.

Explanation B: Inverse Speed Safety Law Maybe the safety evaluation system follows an "inverse speed safety law," where faster bikes are safer and slower ones, like our toddler bike, are dangerous.

Explanation C: Demonstration of Authority Perhaps Mr. Excellent is a high-ranking official in disguise, demonstrating the power of authority and the unpredictability of rules.

Explanation D: Legal Gray Area Maybe there is a legal gray area or room for interpretation that Mr. Excellent is exploiting.

Our Suggestions Based on this "International Vision" and "Child-Friendliness"

Given this "profound" experience, we have some suggestions to honor the unique management style of Qingxiu Mountain:

• Award Qingxiu Mountain the title of "Asia's Almost 10A-Level International Child-Friendly Demonstration Scenic Spot."

• Award the scenic area the "Best Equal Treatment Practice Award" for its selective enforcement of bike entry rules.

• Award the Director of the Guangxi Cultural Tourism Bureau the "Innovative International Tourism Management Practice Award."

• Award the leadership team of Qingxiu Mountain the "Annual Best Hedgehog Award" for their skill in deflecting external criticism.

• Award Mr. Excellent the "Best International Tourism Power Demonstration Award" and the "Annual Best Customer Respect Contribution Award" for his unique communication style.

In conclusion, we strongly recommend that Mr. Excellent be promoted to a higher position where his unique "management talents" can be fully utilized.

三月三广西南宁青秀山景区 |一场关于“准入”的荒诞戏剧,一次5A级景区的刷新认知

2025的4月1号10点多，久闻三月三广西南宁青秀山特别不同,我们带娃推着辆幼儿小单车在无数场合下被认证为“人畜无害”——就是您图上所见那迷你型号，其尺寸之袖珍，恐怕连一只中等体型的宠物犬都能在体积上与之较量一番——满怀对“国家AAAAA级旅游景区”广西南宁市青秀山的久仰之情（毕竟是“闻名遐迩”，据说风景这边独好），兴冲冲地抵达了其“神圣”的入口，准备购票入内，重温旧梦，顺便让孩子感受下这南国绿肺的“国际级”魅力。

殊不知，这个三月三，以及这辆小单车，即将共同构成一出足以载入个人旅游史册，甚至值得在未来管理学案例分析中占据一席之地的微型荒诞剧。而这出剧的主角之一，便是那位守卫在入口处的查票员。由于信息匮乏，我们无从得知其尊姓大名或光荣岗位编号，姑且，本着对所有景区人士的“敬意”，我们暂且尊称其为——Mr.青秀山国际优秀查票员（Mr. Excellent Qingxiu Mountain International Ticket Checker）。

N分贝的权威与“童车禁入”的律令

购票流程波澜不惊，毕竟现代科技加持下，一手交钱一手拿票的古老仪式已改成扫码与确认。真正的戏剧冲突，爆发在验票入园的关键节点。当我们将那辆堪称“玩具级”的幼儿单车随同人流推向入口时，这位“优秀先生”登场了。

请允许我动用一些修辞手法来描绘当时的情景，否则不足以表达我们内心的波澜。这位“优秀先生”，并未采用通常服务行业所倡导的“春风化雨”或至少是“平和”的沟通方式，而是骤然释放出一种——据我们未经精密仪器测量的保守估计，至少达到“N分贝”量级的——声波攻击。这声波并非简单的音量问题，关键在于其蕴含的特质：一种不容置疑、缺乏铺垫、近乎命令式的权威感，其核心信息—“这辆小单车，不准入园！”

我们，作为对风景名胜区充满敬畏（并且付了门票费）的普通游客，当场愣住了。如同在欣赏高雅音乐时突然播放了重金属摇滚。诧异，是当时最直接也最贴切的情绪表达。为何诧异？

经验法则的挑战。这辆在我们眼中几乎可以忽略不计的小单车，此前伴随我们带幼小的娃，如同忠诚的骑士般，踏遍了南宁市乃至广西其他地区的众多景区。这其中，既有市政慷慨解囊提供的免费景区，也有收费景点；既有冠以“星级”的场所，也不乏朴素的社区绿地；甚至包括一些同样标榜“国际化”的风景区。在所有这些地方，这辆小小的童车，都被理所当然地视为幼儿的辅助，与婴儿推车享受同等待遇，畅行无阻。从未有任何管理人员对其表示过异议，更不用说如此斩钉截铁地“依法”禁止。

经历的直接否定。更令人费解的是，我们并非首次造访青秀山。记忆的胶片清晰地回放着上一次的游览经历，当时，这辆一模一样的小单车，曾在那绿树成荫的小径上留下稚嫩的辙痕。换言之，根据“一事不再理”的朴素原则（虽然这里并非司法场景，但逻辑相通），以及“既往许可”的合理预期，我们有充分理由相信，此次携带童车入园，当属合情合理合法之举。

“5A级”标准的反向体现。国家AAAAA级旅游景区，这块金字招牌，通常意味着更高的管理水平、更完善的服务设施、更人性化的游客体验。我们朴素地认为，这种级别的景区，在规则制定与执行上，应更具包容性与便利性，尤其是在对待携带幼儿的家庭游客方面。禁止一辆明显用于辅助低龄儿童移动的童车入内，似乎与“5A”所代表的“游客至上”理念背道而驰。

异议的提出与权威的再确认

基于以上理由，我们尝试向这位“Mr.青秀山优秀查票员”表达我们的困惑与异议。这位“优秀先生”的回应，是再次提升了他的“N分贝”权威音量，并辅以一种足以让任何质疑者望而却步的不屑与藐视。他并未就我们的疑问进行任何实质性解答，例如引述某条具体的管理规定，或是解释此次禁止与上次允许之间的政策变化。没有！只是以不屑的权威的领导的口吻，重复并加强了最初的：“这辆车不准带就是不准带！”

面对如此“权威级”、“领导级”的指示，我们这些平民游客，除了选择“服从”，似乎别无方法。只能将那辆小单车，放在了景区外的停车场。

园内的“单车联合国”

我们步入了青秀山景区的大门，却赫然发现，园区内竟然穿梭着各种各样、大小不一的单车，种类之繁多，可以媲美一场博览会，赫然呈现出一派“百花齐放”的景象，琳琅满目，悠然地存在于这片“禁止我们那辆小童车进入”的神圣土地上！

这里有：

专业赛车：线条流畅，一看便知是追求速度与激情的骑行爱好者的座驾。其潜在速度与冲击力，恐怕远超我们那辆蹒跚学步的幼儿车。

• 大尺寸童车：明显比我们那辆更为高大、结构更复杂的儿童单车，有的甚至配有辅助轮，显然也是供孩童使用的。

• 普通成人单车：标准的通勤或休闲单车，体积、重量均远超我们那辆被拒之门外的“小不点”。

这些形形色色的“单车联合国成员”，或停放，或被推行，或由主人骑乘，怡然地融入了青秀山的湖光山色之中。此情此景，让我们刚刚经历的那场关于“童车禁入”的严肃交涉，显得特别荒诞与滑稽。

我们再次找到那位依然矗立在入口处的“Mr.优秀青秀山查票员”，这位我们现在有理由尊称其为**“南宁青秀山旅游景区的领导与管理权威化身”的“优秀先生”。我们指着园内那些单车同类，质问：“为何这些单车可以入园，而我们那辆小得多的童车却被禁止？”

面对这铁证如山的“区别对待”，这位“领导与权威化身”的Mr.优秀青秀山查票员并未显露出一丝需要解释的窘迫。再次启动了那“不容质疑探讨”的“N分贝”模式，其核心逻辑（如果可以称之为逻辑的话）依然简单粗暴：“你们那辆就是不准进！那些单车能进，你们的就是不能！” 当我们追问理由或标准时，他给出了一个“终极解决方案”：“你们可以投诉！”随口报出了一个电话号码。这个号码如同一个都市传说，反复拨打，只有冰冷的“无法接通”的提示，其存在本身，似乎就是为了构成一个完整的“官僚主义闭环”。

礼貌的缺席与“Civilized city”的注脚

纵观整个交涉过程，从最初的接触到最终的“投诉指引”，我们始终未能从这位“优秀先生”口中听到哪怕一个礼貌用语。取而代之的，是一种难以言喻的不屑与傲慢，仿佛我们的存在本身，以及那辆可怜的小单车，都是对其“神圣”工作的一种干扰。

这不禁让我们想起了南宁市头顶那顶闪亮的桂冠——“全国civilized city”。不仅在于市容的整洁、设施的完善，更在于人与人之间的相互尊重，在于服务人员的职业素养与待人接物的涵养。在这样一个“国际知名”的“civilized city”里，在其引以为傲的“5A级”景区门口，我们所遭遇的，却是一次与“civilization”一词相去甚远的互动体验。这不能不让人产生一种强烈的认知失调感。

费解的逻辑与“砖家”视角的推演

事已至此，我们不得不尝试去理解这背后可能存在的“深层逻辑”。基于“优秀先生”的言行以及园内外的鲜明对比，我们被迫做出以下几种（极有可能完全错误的）理解：

理解a：体积歧视原则。或许，南宁青秀山景区存在一项内部规定，即：禁止体积“未达到”某一神秘标准的儿童单车入园。这意味着，那些体积更大、结构更复杂的单车（包括赛车、成人车、大童车）因为“达标”了，所以对园区安全不构成威胁；而我们那辆结构简单、尺寸袖珍的幼儿单车，恰恰因为其“不达标”的“微小”，反而蕴含着某种难以预测的、足以危及百万游客安全的巨大风险。这种逻辑，堪称现代物理学与风险管理学的一大颠覆性创见。

理解b：速度反比例安全定律。另一种可能的解释是，青秀山的安全评估体系遵循一种独特的“速度反比例安全定律”。即：速度越快的自行车（如赛车），其危险性越低，故可放行；而速度慢到几乎可以忽略不计的幼儿单车（其最高时速取决于幼儿蹬踏的频率与力量，通常低于成年人步行速度），反而构成了最高级别的安全隐患。这一定律，若能推广，必将彻底改写交通安全法规。

理解c：“权威”的示范。或许，这位“Mr.青秀山优秀查票员”并非普通，而是景区某位深藏不露的领导，甚至是传说中微服私访的市级乃至省级旅游管理部门的大佬。此举的目的，可能是在进行一项关于“管理威慑力”的现场演练，意在向广大游客展示：在南宁的“国际范”景区里，“权威”是如何运作的，“规定”是如何体现其“科学”与“不可预测”的。这是一种高深的“行为艺术式”管理教学。

理解d：未被发现的法规洼地。我们本着求真务实的精神，尝试查阅了国家相关的文化旅游法律法规，以及南宁市、青秀山景区官方发布的管理条例。然而，遍寻之下，我们未能找到任何一条规定禁止“体积未达标”或特定类型的儿童单车入园的条款。这是否意味着，存在一个法律法规的“灰色地带”或“解释空间”，被这位“Mr.青秀区优秀查票员”以其超凡的“法律直觉”精准捕捉并加以运用？

基于“国际视野”与“儿童友好”的若干建议

经历了这番“深刻”的体验，我们深感南宁青秀山景区及其管理模式，在某些方面已然走在了“时代前列”，甚至可能超出了我们凡夫俗子的理解范畴。为了表彰这种“独树一帜”的管理风格与服务水平，我们谨在此提出一系列颁奖建议：

授予南宁青秀山景区“亚洲准10A级国际旅游儿童友好型示范景区”荣誉称号。理由：其在门禁管理上展现出的“高标准、严要求”，尤其是在甄别“潜在危险”的微型童车方面，体现了超前的风险防控意识，为亚洲乃至全球景区设立了新的（难以企及的）标杆。虽然对儿童及其辅助的友好度似乎有待商榷，但这恰恰是其“独特”所在。

“南宁青秀山景区最佳平等对待实践奖”：其在处理不同类型、不同尺寸单车入园问题上所展现出的“高度选择”与“区别对待”，为我们深刻诠释了“规则面前，并非人人平等”这一古老哲学命题在现代旅游管理中的具体应用。

授予广西文化旅游厅厅长“国际旅游管理模式创新实践奖”。理由：在其卓越领导下，辖区内的标杆景区能够涌现出如此富有“创造”与“挑战”的管理实践，这无疑是一种管理上的“大胆创新”。这种模式对于激发游客的“逆商”、培养游客的“服从性”以及深化游客对“权威”的理解，具有不可估量的价值。

授予南宁青秀山景区以梁某为核心的领导集体“南宁旅游界年度最佳刺猬奖”。理由：该领导集体在面对游客合理质疑时，展现出的高超领导技巧，犹如刺猬一般，成功地将外部意见与内部运作隔开来，保持了政策的“稳定”与“神秘”。

授予那位“Mr.青秀山优秀查票员”（Mr. Excellent Qingxiu Mountain International Ticket Checker）以下几项殊荣：

• “南宁市青秀区最佳国际旅游权力运用示范奖”：以表彰其在基层岗位上，对“权力”的理解与运用达到了炉火纯青、出神入化的境界。

“南宁市年度最佳游客尊重贡献奖”：通过其独特的“N分贝沟通法”与“零礼貌服务”，为全市旅游从业人员提供了一个“如何尊重游客”的教学案例。

• “亚洲区域最佳游客时间节约奖”：虽然其行为直接导致了我们在入口处的滞留与后续处理单车的额外时间消耗，但从长远来看，这种“下马威”式的体验，或许能有效劝退部分“不够顺从”或“携带‘违规’物品”的游客，从而在宏观上为景区“节约”了接待资源。

基于这位“Mr.青秀山优秀查票员”所展现出的卓越“才华”与“立场”，我们斗胆提出一项人事建议：强烈推荐这位“优秀先生”晋升为广西文化旅游厅厅长的助理，或至少，担任南宁青秀山景区某位核心领导的助理。理由无他，唯有如此重要的岗位，方能使其独特的“管理天赋”与“沟通技巧”得到最大程度的发挥，为广西的旅游事业贡献出更为“非凡”的力量。