athletes are disappointed with their smart health connected objects

[ad_1]

smart health connected objects are becoming more and more common in the practice of sports and sports training. However, these devices have received a lot of criticism from athletes at the Rio 2020 Olympic Games. According to these professional athletes, the wearables do not provide enough advice and instructions.

According to a study published by Lux Research, athletes see many benefits from using smart health connected devices. However, they want builders to play a more active role in providing more advice.

Lack of advice and instruction

These instructions would involve analysis of training performance, but also methods of avoiding injury, and tips for better health. The current market leader, Fitbit, currently offers limited analyzes, apart from a weekly assessment of the efforts made, coupled with the level of heart rate and the number of calories burned during training.

According to Noa Ghersin of Lux Research, most of the wearables currently on offer excel in factual reporting. However, they do not educate consumers about how to change their behavior to improve their health and achieve their performance goals.

The Rio 2020 Olympics demonstrated that smart health connected objects can help monitoring technique, not just activity. However, other applications for sport need to be developed, such as team strategy and security.

Two wearables appreciated by the Major League

In Major League Baseball, coaches and doctors use two wearables for detailed performance analysis. These are the Zephyr Bioharness, and the Motus elbow sleeve. These two devices also make it possible to know with what force a ball is thrown or struck.

From there, coaches may notice a lack of training, while physicists can monitoring health issues to be addressed before an important game. These features are extremely practical.

Professional sports carefully embrace wearables

Other American sports are gradually embracing the smart health connected objects industry. However, in order to avoid the saturation of technology on the ground, caution is advised. There are also concerns that coaches will rely on analytics to fire a player from a team.

Three wearables reviewed

As part of its study, Lux Research interviewed a panel of athletes on three smart health connected objects. These are the Under Armor Healthbox, the Xmetrics swimming wearable, and the Green.

Regarding the HealthBox, athletes believe that it does not provide enough informative information. She cannot therefore replace a personal trainer yet. Xmetrics must make its measurements easier to understand. Finally, Green lacks alerts and recommendations to avoid injury.

FDA as the main culprit?

All these criticisms are indeed valid. However, one of the explanations for this low level of information and the lack of medical advice is related to the strict regulations. The FDA is very tough on wearables that try to be presented as medical products. The Apple Watch was, for example, rejected by this strict institution. Regulatory bodies therefore need to be more open to allow athletes to receive more information and advice.

Do you share the opinion of Rio's athletes?

[ad_2]

 AB Smart Health

 Review